I had a roofer come by and inspect my home for hail damage, and he showed me the many pits in my shingles.  So I called my insurance company (Cotton States) and they sent a roofer named Larry Crawford to inspect the roof. Larry came out said that there was no hail damage.

So I requested another independent inspection from another company and they showed me the damage as well. So I called Cotton States Insurance and Larry Crawford again, and they sent an engineer from Rimkus Engineering [Phil].  On 5/31/11, he and a roofer went on my roof. The roofer pointed out the damage and Phil said he just did not see it.

I know that the houses around me had or are having their roofs replaced due to the hail damage that occurred on 3/27/11. So why is Cotton States trying so hard to deny the claim of a paying customer?

Submitted By: Ray Herrin

Location: Dothan / Alabama / Houston Country